Misery Is Not Miserly
![Thumbnail](/bitstream/handle/1/37093805/Misery-is-not-Miserly.pdf.jpg?sequence=6&isAllowed=y)
View/ Open
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02118.xMetadata
Show full item recordCitation
Cryder, Cynthia E., Jennifer S. Lerner, James J. Gross, and Ronald E. Dahl. 2008. “Misery Is Not Miserly.” Psychological Science 19 (6) (June): 525–530. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02118.x.Abstract
Misery is not miserly: sadness increases the amount of money decision makers give up to acquire a commodity (Lerner, Small, & Loewenstein, 2004). The present research investigated when and why the “misery-is-not-miserly” effect occurs. Drawing on William James’s (1890) concept of the material self, we tested a model specifying relationships among sadness, self-focus, and the amount of money decision makers spend. Consistent with our Jamesian hypothesis, results revealed that self-focus both moderates and mediates the effect of sadness on spending. Results were consistent across males and females. Because the study used real commodities and real money, results hold implications for everyday decisions. They also hold implications for theoretical development. Economic theories of spending may benefit from incorporating psychological theories – specifically theories of emotion and the self.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37093805
Collections
- HKS Faculty Scholarship [762]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)