Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChoi, James J.
dc.contributor.authorLaibson, David I.
dc.contributor.authorMadrian, Brigitte
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-27T18:13:44Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationChoi, James J., David Laibson, and Brigitte Madrian. 2011. $100 Bills on the Sidewalk: Violations of No-Arbitrage in 401(k) Accounts. The Review of Economics and Statistics 93(3): 748-763.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0034-6535en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9647368
dc.description.abstractWe identify employees at seven companies whose 401(k) investment choices are dominated because they are contributing less than the employer matching contribution threshold despite being vested in their match and being able to make penalty-free 401(k) withdrawals for any reason because they are older than 59½. At the average firm, 36% of match-eligible employees over age 59½ forgo arbitrage profits that average 1.6% of their annual pay, or $507. A survey educating employees about the free lunch they are forgoing raised contribution rates by a statistically insignificant 0.67% of income among those completing the survey.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMIT Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00100en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.subjectfinanceen_US
dc.subjectretirement economicsen_US
dc.subject401(k) contributionsen_US
dc.subjectbehavioral economicsen_US
dc.subjectno-arbitrageen_US
dc.title$100 Bills on the Sidewalk: Violations of No-Arbitrage in 401(k) Accountsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalReview of Economics and Statisticsen_US
dash.depositing.authorMadrian, Brigitte
dc.date.available2012-09-27T18:13:44Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1162/REST_a_00100*
dash.contributor.affiliatedMadrian, Brigitte
dash.contributor.affiliatedLaibson, David


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record