Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorOstrowski, Donald
dc.contributor.authorRaynold, Curtis
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-27T13:25:24Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-06
dc.date.submitted2012-11
dc.identifier.citationRaynold, Curtis. 2012. The Political Economy of Caribbean Regionalism in the Twenty-First Century: Rebirth or Resuscitation? Master's thesis, Harvard Division of Continuing Education.
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42668776*
dc.descriptionThis research was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Liberal Arts (ALM) in the field of Government to the Division of Continuing Education, Faculty of Arts & Sciences. It was directed/supervised by Professor David E. Bloom, the Clarence James Gamble Professor of Economics and Demography at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. The related master's degree was awarded on 6 November 2012en_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough the states comprising the English-speaking Caribbean have much in common, integrating them politically and economically has proven to be an extremely challenging endeavor. All three integration initiatives since 1958 whether political or economic have failed to deliver their economic development and trade expansion goals. Uncompromising insular political interests of the key participants were at the heart of the demise of the West Indies Federation, the Caribbean’s first integration attempt. These interests have continued to be a dominant influence in the outcomes of the later attempts to integrate. Integration efforts have, been hampered by the absence of a strong political commitment to regionalization. Despite the chequered history of Caribbean integration, the Caribbean Single Market and Economy (CSME) were established in 2006. That arrangement essentially provided for a deeper form of economic integration, requiring a higher level of political commitment to integration than ever before. Specifically this paper seeks to answer the question: is this latest arrangement any different from its three predecessors in terms of its expected results? The following discussion shows that while the concept of the CSME is radically different, the current approach to its implementation is not fundamentally different to that of the three previous ventures. As such, it does not represent the rebirth of Caribbean regionalism but rather, an attempt to resuscitate a politically and structurally flawed development strategy. The renewed ambition to integrate is not matched by the requisite political will and commitment to effectively carry the new venture forward. I use a combination of historical, political, and economic analysis as the primary methodological approach to test this hypothesis. I conclude that while a renewed political will might have overcome some past hurdles, that commitment still falls far short of the unified force required to create a robust and deeper form of integration that addresses economic and other challenges and keeps the region afloat in the relentless tidal flow of economic globalization.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleThe Political Economy of Caribbean Regionalism in the Twenty-First Century: Rebirth or Resuscitation?en_US
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_US
dc.date.available2020-05-27T13:25:24Z
dash.affiliation.otherFaculty of Arts & Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.date2012en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGovernmenten_US
thesis.degree.grantorHarvard Division of Continuing Educationen_US
thesis.degree.levelMASTERSen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Liberal Arts in Extension Studiesen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6270-8475
dash.contributor.affiliatedRaynold, Curtis


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record