dc.contributor.author | Fox, William John | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-16T13:49:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Fox, William John. "Junk News: Can Public Broadcasters Buck the Tabloid Tendencies of Market-Driven Journalism? A Canadian Experience." Shorenstein Center Discussion Paper Series 1997.D-26, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, August 1997. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37371062 | * |
dc.description.abstract | In public policy terms, Canadian political elites have long considered constitutional reform a pre-condition for the continued existence of the Canadian federation. Yet for political journalists, the clause-by-clause reporting of proposed changes to the constitutional amending formula or the various options for Senate Reform that both Meech Lake and Charlottetown produced challenged today’s increasingly consumer-sensitive definition of what constitutes “news.”
For illustrative purposes, this paper will focus on the CBC’s English-language coverage during peak news periods for each initiative—a First Minister’s Conference (June 3-10, 1990) for Meech Lake, and for the Charlottetown Accord the referendum campaign in September and October, 1992. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy | en_US |
dash.license | Pass Through | |
dc.title | Junk News: Can Public Broadcasters Buck the Tabloid Tendencies of Market-Driven Journalism? A Canadian Experience | en_US |
dc.type | Research Paper or Report | en_US |
dc.description.version | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Shorenstein Center Discussion Paper Series | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-16T13:49:23Z | |