Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection
View/ Open
Quadrantic_deficit_reveals_anatomical_constraints_.pdf (579.9Kb)
Access Status
Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702685104Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Carlson, Thomas A., George A. Alvarez, and Patrick Cavanagh. "Quadrantic Deficit Reveals Anatomical Constraints on Selection." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, no. 33 (2007): 13496-13500.Abstract
Our conscious experience is of a seamless visual world, but many of the cortical areas that underlie our capacity for vision have a fragmented or asymmetrical representation of visual space. In fact, the representation of the visual field is fragmented into quadrants at the level of V2, V3, and possibly V4. In theory, this division could have no functional consequences and therefore no impact on behavior. Contrary to this expectation, we find robust quadrant- level interference effects when attentively tracking two moving targets. Performance improves when target objects appear in separate quadrants (straddling either the horizontal or vertical meridian) compared with when they appear the same distance apart but within a single quadrant. These quadrant-level interference effects would not be predicted by cognitive theories of attention and tracking that do not take anatomical constraints into account. Quadrant-level interference strongly suggests that cortical areas containing a noncontiguous representation of the four quadrants of the visual field (i.e., V2, V3, and V4) impose an important constraint on attentional selection and attentive tracking.Citable link to this page
https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37363149
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18295]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)