Chandra Study of an Overdensity of X-Ray Sources around Two Distant (z ~ 0.5) Clusters
![Thumbnail](/bitstream/handle/1/30212188/chandrastudy.pdf.jpg?sequence=4&isAllowed=y)
View/ Open
Author
Cappi, M.
Mazzotta, P.
Burke, D. J.
Comastri, A.
Fiore, F.
Green, P.
Harris, D.
Hooper, E. J.
Jones, C.
Kaastra, J. S.
Kellogg, E.
Murray, S.
Nicastro, F.
Ponman, T. J.
Schlegel, E. M.
Virani, S.
Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1086/319063Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Cappi, M., P. Mazzotta, M. Elvis, D. J. Burke, A. Comastri, F. Fiore, W. Forman, et al. 2001. “Chandra Study of an Overdensity of X-Ray Sources around Two Distant (z ~ 0.5) Clusters.” The Astrophysical Journal 548 (2) (February 20): 624–638. doi:10.1086/318998.Abstract
We present results from a Chandra X-Ray Observatory study of the field X-ray source populations in four different observations: two high-redshift (z ~ 0.5) clusters of galaxies 3C 295 and RX J003033.2+261819; and two noncluster fields with similar exposure time. Surprisingly, the 0.5-2 keV source surface densities (~900-1200 sources deg-2 at a flux limit of 1.5 × 10-15 ergs cm-2 s-1) measured in an ~8' × 8' area surrounding each cluster exceed by a factor of ~2 the value expected on the basis of the ROSAT and Chandra log N- log S, with a significance of ~2 σ each, or ~3.5 σ when the two fields are combined (i.e., a probability to be a statistical fluctuation of <1% and <0.04%, respectively). The same analysis performed on the noncluster fields and on the outer chips of the cluster fields does not show evidence of such an excess. In both cluster fields, the summed 0.5-10 keV spectrum of the detected objects is well fitted by a power law with Γ ~ 1.7 similar to active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and shows no sign of intrinsic absorption. The few (~10 of 35) optical identifications available to date confirm that most of them are, as expected, AGNs, but the number of redshifts available is too small to allow conclusions on their nature. We discuss possible interpretations of the overdensity in terms of a statistical variation of cosmic background sources; a concentration of AGNs and/or powerful starburst galaxies associated with the clusters; and gravitational lensing of background QSOs by the galaxy clusters. All explanations, however, are difficult to reconcile with the large number of excess sources detected. Deeper X-ray observations and more redshifts measurements are clearly required to settle the issue.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:30212188
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18304]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)