Accuracy, Transparency, and Incentives: Contrasting Criteria for Evaluating Growth Models.
Author
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ho, Andrew D. 2012. Accuracy, Transparency, and Incentives: Contrasting Criteria for Evaluating Growth Models. Paper presented at the conference on Value Added Modeling and Growth Modeling with Particular Application to Teacher and School Effectiveness. College Park, MD: Maryland Assessment Research Center for Education Success.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27471536
Collections
- GSE Scholarly Articles [372]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)