Enrollee Mix, Treatment Intensity, and Cost in Competing Indemnity and HMO Plans
View/ Open
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00094-2Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Cutler, David M., Daniel Altman, and Richard J. Zeckhauser. 2003. Enrollee mix, treatment intensity, and cost in competing indemnity and HMO Plans. Journal of Health Economics 22(1): 23-45.Abstract
Why do indemnity insurance plans cost substantially more per capita—77% more in our study—than HMOs? We answer this question using data from a large organization’s insurance pool, covering 215,000 lives. We decompose cost differences for eight major medical conditions into four sources: demographics, incidence within demographic groups, treatment intensity, and prices per service. Greater incidence of disease in the indemnity plan (both from demographics themselves and within demographic groups) and higher prices each explain nearly 50% of the difference. Contrary to conventional wisdom, indemnity plans do not have greater treatment intensity.Other Sources
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=238478http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/cutler/files/Enrollee%20Mix,%20Treatment%20Intensity%20and%20Cost%20in%20Competing%20Indemnity%20and%20HMO%20Plans.pdf
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:2664300
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18299]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)