Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNorton, Daniel J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Victoria A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Michaela F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Gretchen O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSomers, David C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCronin-Golomb, Aliceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-01T15:48:13Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.citationNorton, Daniel J., Victoria A. Nguyen, Michaela F. Lewis, Gretchen O. Reynolds, David C. Somers, and Alice Cronin-Golomb. 2016. “Visuospatial Attention to Single and Multiple Objects Is Independently Impaired in Parkinson's Disease.” PLoS ONE 11 (3): e0150013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150013.en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:26318665
dc.description.abstractParkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with deficits in visuospatial attention. It is as yet unknown whether these attentional deficits begin at a perceptual level or instead reflect disruptions in oculomotor or higher-order processes. In the present study, non-demented individuals with PD and matched normal control adults (NC) participated in two tasks requiring sustained visuospatial attention, both based on a multiple object tracking paradigm. Eye tracking was used to ensure central fixation. In Experiment 1 (26 PD, 21 NC), a pair of identical red dots (one target, one distractor) rotated randomly for three seconds at varied speeds. The task was to maintain the identity of the sole target, which was labeled prior to each trial. PD were less accurate than NC overall (p = .049). When considering only trials where fixation was maintained, however, there was no significant group difference, suggesting that the deficit’s origin is closely related to oculomotor processing. To determine whether PD had additional impairment in multifocal attention, in Experiment 2 (25 PD, 15 NC), two targets were presented along with distractors at a moderate speed, along with a control condition in which dots remained stationary. PD were less accurate than NC for moving (p = 0.02) but not stationary targets. This group difference remained significant when considering only trials where fixation was maintained, suggesting the source of the PD deficit was independent from oculomotor processing. Taken together, the results implicate separate mechanisms for single vs. multiple object tracking deficits in PD.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150013en
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786138/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectBiology and Life Sciencesen
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen
dc.subjectCognitive Scienceen
dc.subjectCognitive Psychologyen
dc.subjectAttentionen
dc.subjectPsychologyen
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciencesen
dc.subjectNeurologyen
dc.subjectNeurodegenerative Diseasesen
dc.subjectMovement Disordersen
dc.subjectParkinson Diseaseen
dc.subjectPhysiologyen
dc.subjectSensory Physiologyen
dc.subjectVisual Systemen
dc.subjectEye Movementsen
dc.subjectSensory Systemsen
dc.subjectComputer and Information Sciencesen
dc.subjectComputer Visionen
dc.subjectTarget Detectionen
dc.subjectVigilance (Psychology)en
dc.subjectAnatomyen
dc.subjectHeaden
dc.subjectEyesen
dc.subjectOcular Systemen
dc.subjectNeural Networksen
dc.subjectSensory Perceptionen
dc.subjectVisionen
dc.titleVisuospatial Attention to Single and Multiple Objects Is Independently Impaired in Parkinson's Diseaseen
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalPLoS ONEen
dash.depositing.authorNorton, Daniel J.en_US
dc.date.available2016-04-01T15:48:13Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0150013*
dash.contributor.affiliatedNorton, Daniel J.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record