Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHayeck, Tristanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-04T18:41:30Z
dc.date.created2015-11en_US
dc.date.issued2015-09-28en_US
dc.date.submitted2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationHayeck, Tristan. 2015. Retrospective Mixed Model and Propensity Score Methods for Case Control Data. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:23845417
dc.description.abstractIn chapter one a Liability Threshold Mixed Linear Model (LTMLM) association statistic is introduced for ascertained case-control studies that increases power vs. existing mixed model methods for diseases with low prevalence, with a well-controlled false-positive rate. Using a chi-square score statistic computed from posterior mean liabilities (PML) under the liability threshold model. Each individual’s PML is conditional not only on that individual’s case-control status, but also on every individual’s case-control status and on the genetic relationship matrix obtained from the data estimated using a multivariate Gibbs sampler. In a Welcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2 (WTCCC2) multiple sclerosis data set LTMLM attained a 4.3% improvement (P=0.005) in chi-square statistics (vs. existing mixed model methods) at 75 known associated SNPs. Family-biased ascertainment is considered in chapter 2, where cases and controls are ascertained non-randomly with respect to family relatedness. We introduce a family based association statistic (LT-Fam) that is robust to this problem. For type 2 diabetes cases and controls (in the Jackson Heart Study) we down-sampled to increase relatedness among cases and observed: ATT was inflated and MLM was deflated, while LT-Fam was properly calibrated. Finally, in chapter three, we propose a 2-Step Bayesian Model Averaging (2-Step BMA) method with Propensity Score (PS) adjustment that targets the primary treatment of interest characterizing the treatment effect while controlling for a high dimensional set of unknown confounders including metabolites and other epidemiological factors. This method improves on existing methods by averaging over the entire model space of both the treatment and outcome models to control for cofounding while targeting treatment effect and without need of an arbitrary number of confounders to include a priori.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBiostatisticsen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectBiology, Biostatisticsen_US
dc.subjectStatisticsen_US
dc.titleRetrospective Mixed Model and Propensity Score Methods for Case Control Dataen_US
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_US
dash.depositing.authorHayeck, Tristanen_US
dc.date.available2015-12-04T18:41:30Z
thesis.degree.date2015en_US
thesis.degree.grantorGraduate School of Arts & Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPrice, Alkesen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberZigler, Corwinen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberliang, limingen_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
thesis.degree.departmentBiostatisticsen_US
dash.identifier.vireohttp://etds.lib.harvard.edu/gsas/admin/view/582en_US
dc.description.keywordsMixed Model; Propensity Score; GWASen_US
dash.author.emailtristan.hayeck@gmail.comen_US
dash.identifier.drsurn-3:HUL.DRS.OBJECT:25142589en_US
dash.contributor.affiliatedHayeck, Tristan


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record